Science and Dissent
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Dissent over Dissent Over Descent
This paper is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item and our policy information available from the repository home page for further information. To see the final version of this paper please visit the publisher’s website. Access to the published version may require a subscri...
متن کاملTo Dissent or not to Dissent? Informative Dissent and Parliamentary Governance
Legislative dissent occurs frequently in most parliamentary systems despite its potential detrimental effects on both party and legislator, i.e., legislators depend on their party label for re-election, whose value in turn depends in part on the party’s ability to appear cohesive. Commonly dissent has been attributed to ‘extreme’ preferences. I provide an informational rationale for dissent. Di...
متن کاملCentre for the Philosophy of Natural and Social Science Contingency and Dissent in
The term “basic research” is ubiquitous in present debates on policy in science and higher education. It is a term with positive connotations, important for example in legitimising traditional universities. The popular term “research” generally corresponds to “research and development” (R&D) in official statistics. This includes “applied research” and “technological development” as well as “bas...
متن کاملPrivate Information Retrieval and Dissent
Dissent is an anonymous communication system that offers much stronger anonymity guarantees than Tor. Dissent clients efficiently publish anonymous messages, but any response must be broadcast to all clients. This approach does not scale to many clients or large responses. We’ve developed a private information retrieval scheme that enables clients to receieve responses without the bandwidth bur...
متن کاملDissent in science: styles of scientific practice and the controversy over the cause of AIDS.
In this paper, we use a scientific controversy, and the efforts to legitimize and undermine a theory, to examine the co-production of facts and the rules for verifying facts over time. We discuss these processes in terms of what we call 'styles of scientific practice.' In contrast to the focus of idealist philosophers on theory production and validation as forms of logic or ways of thinking, ou...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: European Review
سال: 2018
ISSN: 1062-7987,1474-0575
DOI: 10.1017/s1062798718000613